Gezondheidsplan?

De Nederlandse staat verbied het mensen om gezond te zijn.
Als mensen bewust gezond eten, genoeg bewegen en risico’s mijden, hebben ze niet echt een gezondheidsverzekering nodig. En als ze diedan ook niet afsluiten, dan worden ze beboet. Dus wordt gezond gedrag sterk ontmoedigd.

Trend

Het meest trieste aan de (in de krant) gesignaleerde trend, is dat de oorzaak zo makelijk valt weg te nemen. Als iemand zo gefrustreerd is door de junta dat hij een zelfmoordaanslag pleegt, dan verander je als politicus toch je gedrag? (En dan bedoel ik alle politici; laat je ongegeneerde en misplaatste minachtimg voor de burger varen). Laat de koning maar het goede voorbeeld geven; hij is verantwoordelijk voor de ondemocratische afgang van de formatie van Rutte3. Als zelfs Mussert1 nog democratischer was dan jouw kabinet, en Hitler nog meer fatsoen had dan jij, dan moet je je eens goed afvragen of je wel op de juiste plek zit.

Social experiment

Politics has been a long running social experiment for the search for the best way to unite a group of people.
Conclusion:
People unite best against a common enemy (the state).
But who conducted this experiment? God? Some mean extraterrestrials?
This experimenter sought simultaneously for how best to divide people. Force peoples that have almost nothing in common to live together, then claim that people one is very mean to the other, and call the one people all sorts of names; take legal measures against the first people (segregation, just like in the pre-1960s USA, but now in The Netherlands, where “positive discrimination” has been formalized and made law).

On governance

  1. Don’t expect a stateless society to be lawless,
  2. Nor a wild-growth of different laws.
  1. 1st point first: in Ancapistan there will be governance, just no (central) government.
  2. Point 2: laws will smoothly synchronize. To the point of a reasonable average across most . Because if one business wishes to impose draconian limits, on stuff that they have no business with (who cares that someone walks into a flower shop, carrying a baggy of cocaine in their coat pocket? So long as they don’t poison the merchandise with that cocaine, keep it in their pocket). It is in no business owner’s interest to differentiate too much, because people prefer predictability. And will avoid doing business with another if that’s uncomfortable.

So, in heaven (I chose to not refer to Ancapistan as Utopia, but that’s my prrleference) the only laws that apply will be the ones that are local to the particular business.
Ergo: if the state wishes to ban drugs, it may only apply those laws to it’s own buildings. Meaning that the laws it passes will become a lot less crazy.

“Hitler wasn’t a real socialist!”

Ooh, big whoop, so Hitler was a progressive socialist, that does not make him any less of a socialist.
Hitler said that he would not have to nationalize the means of production (he did so anyway) because he would nationalize the people instead (hence National Socialism). How does socialising the people instead of the MOP make anyone not a socialist?
If you hate the effects of your ideology so much, why denounce the causator of the effects? Instead of denouncing the ideology (which is what I’d do, but then again, I’m not a socialistic kind of guy)