Throwback to the bad old days

GWB’s attacks on iraq and Afghanistan are worse than anything in the bad old days (and this time, those days may be here to stay).
Think: the hippie-generation got riled up about Kennedy’s brutal slaughter of #Vietnam, and they’ve come of age in the Reagan-era, then they became a force to be reckoned with. The brutality of US terrorism against the Vietnamese even went so far, that one of their own helicopter crews opened fire at the US soldiers. That isn’t counting the countless rapings of young girls.
So this generation caused #Reagan to have to go underground, and perform his terror by way of other countries (ever wondered why #Israel gets its top of the line war jets for free? They don’t: they had to perform democide in Guatemala & elsewhere in South America with them, but there are no up-front costs).
Anoter terrorist nation supported (operationally & financially) by the US, was Hussain’s #Iraq, iirc it was Rumsfeld who was caught on tape, shaking the violent bastard’s hand when telling him that the American people have gone round with the collection tin, to support your regime, and here are the millions of dollars you need to continue killing people. It was the same Donald #Rumsfeld who was among the aggressive war-hawks, aching to invade Iraq after #9/11 (which it has been sufficiently demonstrated, they had nothing to do with.).
The regime also unashamedly invaded Afganistan, because Bin Laden had moved into a cave there.
A transparant excuse to grow the empire by violent means (how else?), at the expense of countless lives – on both(!) sides. If it were really about acquiring or killing Bin Laden, thry could have sent in a small #CIA-team, sure, it would have killed a lot fewer people and it would not have raised the government debt by as much as it did, both key objectives for modern governments, but it would have gotten the job done, and the people didn’t give a peep when the Dubbya-clan undid it all the gains at keeping government in check. Not helped in the least by the communist tendencies of the former protesters (now in more influential positions, in the MSM, in government), that only want to keep government in power using any violence necessary.
So all that was good (the only thing) that came out of the #Vietnam war has been undone, aided by a lazy, complicit MainStream Media (#MSM), that refused to do its job of keeping the government in check, but instead chose to go along with all the propaganda. Not only did they get away with a bunch of wars, they actually drummed up support for them, helped to a quite distressing degree by popular entertainment that glorifies gullible teenage-assassins from poor families as “real American heroes”. Instead people are now glorifying the flag (the political institution), in fact, they can get quite angry when you’re deservedly critical of the political institution, somehow they take that personally.
I feel that the #leftists (in the msm) dropped the ball on purpose, because, well, a big government that can get away with stuff, is a powerful government. Therefore an ideal government.

The 4 roles

John Locke, summed up the only 4 reasons a people might have to accept a government. Protection of:

  1. Life,
  2. Health,
  3. Property
  4. and liberty.

1 & 3. Given that these protections are funded through taxation (theft) and governments are the main killers of citizens (I refer you to Vincent Bugliosi’s book on charging GWB with murder: 100,000 Iraqis were killed, and several tens of thousands of US citizens-turned-soldiers died in that unjustifiable war.) That still leaves out the many Texans governor Bush signed off to be executed. And the many deaths that resulted from actions by/against IS (founded in an American POW camp in Iraq)
Apart from executions, there are many that are locked up for victimless crimes. That is just in the free west alone: communists had/still have a regrettable tendency to shoot at people trying to escape from the worker’s paradise. The eastern block was one big open-air prison.
2. Agricultural subsidies are not only paid for with stolen money, but also harmful to the population – it has long been established (listen to Vinnie Tortorich’s podcast America’s Angriest Trainer for more information) that Sugar and Grains are not that good for you: fat is a better source of energy. And modified foods are even worse.
4.Since protection of popular liberty would harm the interests of government, which considers itself a biological entity in and of itself, having rights such as no citizen ever had, it is not a role government is in any way able (willing to try) to perform.

So, there are no reasons left. Regrettable, statists.

The reason so many left-wing politicians love war

Is, the same as why socialists went to sit on the left in parliament; it’s that left-wingers want to change the world (starting with the country). And the best tool to force change upon a country’s population, is war.
So long as you can fool enough people into thinking that they are the country (at their core, no politician thinks that the people are the country; THEY themselves are), it may become a popular notion that dying to defend your country is a noble thing (especially, when you control the media; just consider how many – mostly American – TV-shows have been & are about glorifying war). When in fact, dying to defend the jobs of the politicians that lord it over the population, is the most cruel thing one may do to the population.
Because war makes all sorts of changes requisite, like:

  • restricting freedom of movement.
  • restricting freedom of speech.
  • Patrolling neighborhoods, keeping people’s behaviors in check.
  • Taxing the crap out of them; because war is costly (also financially, not just bodily & socially)

Tell me what in this list, is worth dying for? Not much…. But yet: examples of lefties loving war so much, in order of appearance:

  • Stalin
  • Hitler
  • Harry S. Truman
  • George W. Bush
  • Both Clintons
  • Barack Obama

Wilders’ bewijsloze aanhoudingen lijken op Obama’s drone-aanslagen

#Wilders’ bewijsloze aanhoudingen-wet verschillen niet veel van #Obama’s #drone-aanslagen, want de dodelijke #slachtoffers daarvan werden ook veroordeeld in,absentia, zonder rechtszaak, kans op beroep, alleen maar op grond van onbevestige beschuldigingen van #terrorisme.

De politiek van het westen jaagt mij angst aan. In mijn korte leven, is het van “het vrije westen” hierin veranderd.

De enige manier om #IS permanent te #ontwapenen, is door het uit te hongeren: staakt alle aanmoedigingen voor mensen, om zich aan te melden.

Welke terrorist opsluiten?

We kunnen lang doorzagen over het hellende vlak mbt de “mogelijke” #terrorist, maar de #NAVO is de grootste terreur-organisatie: zonder de tweede Golf-oorlog had er nooit een #IS bestaan. (Probeer eens vanuit het Noord-Atlantische verdragsgebied in de #PerzischeGolf te komen, daarvoor moet je door de zuid-Atlantische oceaan, rondom Kaap de Goede Hoop) en dan door de Indische Oceaan noordwaarts. Wat mij betefft wordt zijn wetsvoorstel dus op o.a. Wilders zelf toegepast, wat een angstaanjagend rotland is dit aan het worden, dankzij, o.a. (!) #Wilders en zijn zwarthemden.

Als we dan toch bezig zijn sluit dan gelijk #Trump op, want die blijkt geen haar beter dan #Obama.

war against poverty

The best #war against #poverty is the war against war: don’t make new #homeless people
(wars create veterans who become homeless; aggravating the crime against humanity)
And now I’m just talking about the invading army’s assasins: the ones that travel all the way around the world to #kill people, that wouldn’t even know of their existence, the crimes against those people are even greater.
Since war only costs money, it cannot be said to be profitable (except for the #MIC: Military-Industrial Complex): the homeless/dead can’t contribute to the tax base: on top of which people set aside charitable relief-money, the government levies extra taxes to fund medical tratment to enable veteran with destroyed bodies to live out their lives in some degree of comfort & dignity.
Those taxes have to get coughed up by a continuously shrinking tax base, as more tax payers become veterans, consuming taxes just to stay alive.

Mbt terreur

Brief gestuud aan commissie v. Defensie:
Ik vind het onbegrijelijk dat nog niemand in uw kringen, luidkeels het voor de hand liggende heeft verkondigd, nl. dat de “islamterreur” niets anders is dan contraterreur, een reactie op het vierde rijk (Amerikaans imperialisme). En dat dus de manier om IS te verslaan, is om ze te laten doodbloeden qua personeel.
Elke bomaanslag op een huwelijksfeest (is exact identiek aan #Manchester) bezorgd hen weer nieuwe rekruten.
Zelfs de inquisitie (je weet wel, die martelgrage gekken) waren nog moreler dan het Pentagon: ze gaven je van tevoren nog bericht dat je verdacht werd, zodat je kans had om je verdediging voor te bereiden. Het Pentagon zwijgt er gewoon over dat je ter dood veroordeeld bent (op grond van geruchten); geen rechtszaak, geen hoor/wederhoor, in het geheel geen enkele schijn van (kans op) gerechtigheid, gewoon een raket op je kop, ongeacht welke vrouwen & kinderen erbij sterven (ach, het zijn toch maar moslims, dus Untermenschen).

En dankzij de politiek vallen er dus onnodige doden, niet alleen in Arabiƫ, maar ook in eigen land. Dank jullie hartelijk! We weten heel duidelijk wat we aan jullie hebben.