AOW – oplossing

Henk Krol denkt niet na. Wil helemaal niets veranderen om de AOW betaalbaar te houden, wil alleen een hoop poeha schoppen om stemmen te krijgen van goedgelovige bejaarden.
Waarom moet iedereen op dezelfde leeftijd met AOW gaan? Laat dat door individuële werknemers zelf bepalen. Wil iemand jonger met AOW? Leg extra in, bespreek met je werkgever dat je eerder wilt stoppen…

Advertisements

“Rechtsstaat”… !

Ongeloveloos, dat men drugs blijft verbieden en het heeft over dat de gevolgen van dat verbod een ramp zijn voor de rechtsstaat! Waarom zouden ze verboden zijn? Dat veroorzaakt alleen maar misdaad. Een “War over drugs”,ipv een “War against drugs”, die talloze wetten breekt, en dus een ramp is voor de rechtsstaat.

Political theater

Climate, Terrorism…
So much all of politics is political theater, such as terrorist campaigns in Arabia; they do nothing to stop terrorism, in fact; they only cause more (counter-)terrorism. Think of it in terms of dieting: to loose fat, it isn’t just enough to be hungry; one must also change the sorts of foods one puts into one’s mouth, or the chocolate will keep turning into fat. Look at Mark Haub’s Twinky-diet, Mr. Haub “wanted to show that Atkins was wrong, and that it was calories that mattered in fat-loss,” but instead he showed that unless switching to eating non-fattening foods (fat & protein), he would have to starve himself senseless by limiting to a very small amount of chocolate-covered pastry (Twinky’s are rather fattening, though of course, they don’t represent much in the way of food: they’re not very filling, the pastry is fluffy so it’s mostly made of air).
BTW Atkins was right about one thing: it’s carbs that fatten you, you can have all the fat & protein you want and not grow fat (-ter). Of course, to start LOSING fat, a caloric deficit is stil needed, but to prevent starving yourself senseless and not losing any noticeable amount of fat, one would have to stop consuming fattening foods, or the fat lost through hunger, will be replaced by new fat.
(I know the process is more complex than that but in simplest terms, this is the core of the matter)

I digressed into that fat loss bit, to illustrate the fact that, to stop terrorists (the problem of being fat), one would have to stop creating new terrorists (by terrorising innocent Arab civillians; eating chocolate), the only way to keep people safe from terrorist attacks: helping them lose fat is not to terrorise the local population with Stasi-practices, arrests by the secret police (disappearing people)
As Machiavelli wrote: on whether the prince needed a castle: “the only castle the prince needs, is to not be hated.” So my view that Islamic counter-terrorism is caused by western terrorism is not even very original! I was so happy to find out that an authority like Machiavelli had already written about it, so long ago.
Similarly, to reduce CO2 emmissions, the junta in charge will have to start realising that they’re the ones that are causing them; by refusing to cope with the traffic jams (eating too much chocolate), the people (being powerless; after all the country is a democracy) would be happy to reduce emissions (lose fat) and be utterly elated to not be stuck in traffic, for the first time in living memory.
But instead they keep up this political theater, getying thwmselves invited to talk shows on TV, lamenting the horrible emissions / dreadful threat of terrorism…

“Wij vinden” – verbod vakantieverhuur

Hoe durven ze? De baas spelen over andermans eigendommen.
De arbeiderspartij, die er dus tegen is dat mensen in hun eigen inkomen voorzien. Is dat niet de bedoeling van arbeid? Je weet wel, het vierde woordje in jullie partijnaam! Het is maar goed dat de Partij tegen de Arbeider op sterven na dood is, want ze zijn duidelijk vergeten dat ze er voor de arbeider horen te zijn.

War (politics) at the cost of people’s lives

At the latter part of WW2, the Polish resistance made a great effort to drive away the nazis, hoping to avoid being occupied and ruled by Stalin’s already notorious regime.
Stalin wanted to get his hands on Poland, and so refused to supply the resistance with the weapons it needed, merrily letting them get slaughtered/arrested by the dozens. Only to further his own petty pleasures of being the absolute ruler of a few million more people.

Truman knew that Japan had been beaten, admittedly, Japan itself did not know it yet, but with the Soviets in the north, blocking access over,land, and the American navy blocking off access at all other borders (east, south and west are coastal borders), the Japanese government would not be able to acquire supplies/resources for the war machinery. So, really, all it would have taken for Japan to admit defeat and surrender, was a bit of patience.
Militarily, there was absolutely zero need for the murder of all those citizens with the atomic bombs that Truman did, apart from obviously striking fear in the hearts of every other population in the world, that the new boss in town possessed such very mighty weapons and wasn’t reluctant to use them on innocent people. Showing who was in charge.

And more recently, Bush2 (Dubbya) had zero reason to incade Iraq, because there were zero links to Osama Bin Laden. The trumped up excuses were a sham too: WMDs? (The only ones that were there dated back to the Iran-Iraq war and had been launched at Iran with the help of American targeting data).
But it had been long ago decided by the neo conservatives that a regime change would have to take place (be performed) in Iraq.

And the excuse of terrorism, to justify enslaving the population ever more, is also opportunism. As Macchiavelli wrote re any need a prince might have for a castle: “the only castle the prince needs, is not being hated”. To put that in my own words: the best defense against counterterrorism, is not committing terrorism.

Afzettingsprocedure Trump

Wat een hypocriet politiek opportunisme van de Democraten; hun afzettingsprocedure tegen Trump, “omdat hij de veiligheid van Amerika in het geding heeft gebracht.”

En jullie geliefde Obama en Clinton dan? Vooral Barry heeft, met zijn 8 jaar, 7 oorlogen, 1 Nobelprijs voor de vrede en 0 dagen vrede, de haat tegen Amerika (& Europa!) flink aangewakkerd. En dus de kans op aanslagen tegen Amerikaanse en Eurpopese burgers flink vergroot. De enige echte fout van Trump, was dat hij het buitenlands beleid niet 180° heeft gedraaid.

Maar daar hoor ik ze niet over. Het is te hopen dat de Amerikaanse burgers inzien dat de 320mln zielen die ze telt, niet te verdelen zijn over een 1D politiek “spectrum” van links-rechts. En dat die “False dichotomy” het land veroordeeld tot een symbolische maar betekenisloze slingerbeweging van links naar rechts (ook links, zo blijkt) en weer terug.

Als Amerika aangevallen wordt, is er niet één soldaat in Amerika aanwezig om te proberen het te verdedigen. Nu maakt dat weinig uit, want historisch bezien lukt bijna elke invasie van een land door een ander land.

Nepnieuws

Nepnieuws baart de Nederlandse roverheid zorgen! Euhm, met je vingertje naar Rusland wijzen is een gotspe! Jullie grote vrinden in het District of Criminals hebben met nepnieuws over massavernietigingswapens in Irak (waarvan ze wisten dat die niet bestonden) de wereld opgescheept met IS. En dat feit is al heel geruime tijd bekend. Dus: wat jullie nu doen is nepnieuws verspreiden. Grote grutten, flater1 van Rutte3 (dan tel ik de godgeklaagde formatie niet mee; sportief van mij, niet?)
Dat begint goed, Marky Mark!