Welke terrorist opsluiten?

We kunnen lang doorzagen over het hellende vlak mbt de “mogelijke” #terrorist, maar de #NAVO is de grootste terreur-organisatie: zonder de tweede Golf-oorlog had er nooit een #IS bestaan. (Probeer eens vanuit het Noord-Atlantische verdragsgebied in de #PerzischeGolf te komen, daarvoor moet je door de zuid-Atlantische oceaan, rondom Kaap de Goede Hoop) en dan door de Indische Oceaan noordwaarts. Wat mij betefft wordt zijn wetsvoorstel dus op o.a. Wilders zelf toegepast, wat een angstaanjagend rotland is dit aan het worden, dankzij, o.a. (!) #Wilders en zijn zwarthemden.

Als we dan toch bezig zijn sluit dan gelijk #Trump op, want die blijkt geen haar beter dan #Obama.

American political treason

It’s not just Dutch / EU politicians that attack the population/the planet, oh no… Don’t rule out #Obama/#GWB (#George W. #Bush), who both pretended to believe in #Gorism. And who both were responsible for #Echelon, a ridiculous espionage program that consumes so much energy that the Tenth Amendment center attempts to shut down Echelon by keeping states from supplying cooling water to the Echelon computers (GWB started it: Obama continued it; I don’t expect #Trump’s to stop it)

Let that sink in for a bit: the Echelon systems need water-cooling, they use so much energy that even regular air cooling doesn’t suffice. Energy-generation emits heaps of CO2.

All that in order to listen in on Angela Merckel’s cellphone conversations! Angela #Merckel is chief humanoid of the German government! Germany is a #NATO-ally!

Again, #treason, #4thReich

Who actually started WW2? (& NATO v. Russia)

I’m,going on a controversial limb and say that Neville #Chamberlain started World War 2, by declaring war on #Hitler over the invasion of #Poland. Now, obviously, that invasion was a very bad thing, but so was the occupation of Poland (& other countries) by the #Soviets following #WW2 and the occupations of so many other countries during WW2., because Chamberlain, from London, declared war on Hitler in Berlin. The distance to Poland from the UK is considerable, and includes all,of Germany itself. So, a bit weird for the UK to have an alliance with far-away Poland. And Hitler’s response to,te declaration of war was to accept it, and to get his assassins close enough to the British isles, he had to invade the Netherlands, which was inconveniebtly in the way, but at least had a coastline with the same sea (the North) with the UK.

So enter 1940-1945 some of the darkest years ever for the people of the Netherlands my grandad was kidnapped, put to work in a labour camp, upon return home, my mum was conceived. So we could easily state that I owe my existence to socialism.

Of course the invasion of Poland should have been made undone. (And it should not have been followed by a Versaille 2.0, punishing the German people for the deeds of their rulers, wihch by definition they had no influence upon, so no sanctions.)

If not Chamberlain, who should have responded to Germany’s invasion of Poland? I would suggest, Stalin. Since Rusdia and Poland share a border, there was no country in between to get caught between a rock and a hard place. What was Hitler going to do? Invade Poland to take on Russia?

This could have been kept a local war. The fall-out could have been kept relatively small: no eastern block, no iron curtain, perhaps not even Russian ocupation of Poland (no NATO, no Warsaw-pact, perhaps not even an EU) If the socialists had tried that, western forces could have taken action against that. In the real 1945, they could hardly respond to Stalin’s decision to occupy all of eastern Europe, after they let the Russians do the hard work, fight the very hard battles. Stalin got angry at the western allies for not making their move quickly enough, while the Russians were already fighting, taking casualties.

It would have meant, at worst, that only Poland would be occupied by the Soviets (really bad, but all the rest of eastern Europe may have been spared the horror of three-quarters of a century of communism.

And the Afghani & Iraqi people would not have been invaded by a NATO-alliance, because there would not be a NATO.

And there would not now be NATO-exercises held practically on the Russian border, potentially provoking WW3.

One simple bit of restraint would have prevented two wars (plus the entire cold war and its miriad hot wars.)

So: Neville Chamberlain has many a dead milion on his conscience.

This whole post has obviously been predicated upon ignoring the guilt of Hitler for the invasion of Poland,

But since this post is really about the unexpected consequences of policy. We can add WW1 to the tally of gruesome wars resulting from policy. (That’s a bit unfair, becsuse ALL wars result from policy)

If Austrians had not invaded/occupied Serbia, the Iraq-war would not have happened, and #ISIS would not exist. Because: the Ottoman empire had joined the side that lost, and got broken up as a result, creating Iraq which got invaded over #FakeNews-reports about #WMDs there, resulting in Iraqi army-officers in an American #POW-camp founding ISIS.

an antidemocratic dictator

Given the hazardous, criminal, unashamedly open #referendum #fraud in #Turkey (following Erdogan’s revolution against himself)), it is quite necessary for #Trump to intervene and depose Erdogan, who has shown himself to be an antidemocratic dictator, and a threat to Trump’s beloved #NATO: imagine that a despot like Erdogan stays member of NATO.

Artikel 100 & het #VierdeRijk

http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001854/2017-03-01#BoekTweede_TiteldeelI_Artikel92

Deel 2, artikel 100, lijkt mij ook van toepassing op de vele, niet door het geslachtofferde land uitgelokte, expeditie-oorlogen van de VS (ihkv het zgn. ‘”Vierde Rijk”).
Oftewel Hennis & Rutte overtraden de wet, door Nederlandse huurmoordenaars (/militairen) over de hele wereld uit te sturen, op bevel van Obama (/ Trump)

Met gevangenisstraf van ten hoogste tien jaren of geldboete van de vijfde categorie wordt gestraft:

    1°. hij die, in geval van een oorlog waarin Nederland niet betrokken is, opzettelijk enige handeling verricht waardoor het gevaar ontstaat dat de staat in een oorlog wordt betrokken, of enig van regeringswege gegeven en bekendgemaakt bijzonder voorschrift tot handhaving van het niet deelnemen aan de oorlog opzettelijk overtreedt;

 2°. hij die, in tijd van oorlog, enig voorschrift van regeringswege in het belang van de veiligheid van de staat gegeven en bekendgemaakt, opzettelijk overtreedt.

Mensenhandel

Het Nederlandse vluchtelingenbeleid valt ook te betitelen als “mensenhandel”.
Eerst Arabieren uit hun huis wegbombarderen, vervolgens hiernaartoe lokken met belofte van gratis huis en ziektekostenverzekering, enz.
Dan inzetten als gratis verpleegkundige, om de lonen van Nederlandse verplegers te drukken: “Als je het lef hebt loon (-sverhoging) te vragen, vlieg je eruit, voor jouw prijs oneindig veel gratis asielzoekers.” Ordinaire loonpolitiek, dus.
En de linkse politici maar doen alsof ze zo’n groot hart hebben, door al die (geteelde) asielzoekers binnen tewillen laten. Vreemd genoeg ontstaat er een hele geluks-industrie omheen, en dat allemaal over de ruggen van mensen die het echt moeilijk hebben.