A mildly hopeful tone

In the ancient Roman empire the people were kept calm with bread and games (gladiators, fighting other hgladiators, or wild animals from elsewhere in the empire)
In the contemporary political emipires, the peoples of the west are kept calm, by different forms of bread and games: welfare passes for bread today, and elections for games. Elections serve to give the people the illussion that they are able to exert any influence on their destinies.
Which is an improvement upon the #Roman approach of using mere, shallow entertainment and the fanning of bloodlust to keep the #plebs silent. Contemporary plebs are deceived and entertained, as much as the ancient lot, but the emphasis has shifted: Instead of merely having their attention diverted from #exploitation and #expropriation, they want actual influence on their own affairs, of course they do not get any, but the effort is made to let peoploids have the illussion that they do.
And that fills me with hope for the future (I’m not really filled to the brim, but it’s a start), for if this trend continues, it can only lead to democracy- for the first time in this planet’s history.


Atmosphere of hate 1

Bill de Blasio is a shining example of politicians’ genetic incapacity fr self reflection. In response to the bomb packages delivred to, at first the Obama’s and Clinton’s doors, later also to Biden and DeNiro, he correctly identified the contemporary atmosphere as one of hate, then bravely proceeded to blame Trump for this atmosphere of hate.😫
What an imbecile! He willfully contributed to that atmosphere, by showering more hatred upon Trump.

If there is a (gun or bomb) attack on the white house in the (recent) future, de Blasio is at least partly responsible.

“market failure”?

Setting the stage impatiently for Climatology’s penultimate goal (even further totalitarian control over mankind) some politicians have gone on to call high CO2-emissions a “market failure”. I suppose one can speak of market of MPs, but parliament does not offer a market of more than one opinion. So high CO2-levels can not be called a market failure, since there is no market.

The big problem with elections, is that we (the people) can only vote for politicians, so there is no choice (and it’s flouted anyway).

“The Truth About Vegans….”


I’ve been commenting/ replying to comments on this video, and thought I’d share some of the comments on my blog.

This first was a reply to SogMosee in a thread about factory cloning of meat which would replace breeding animals for their meat (which is also the only way to get enough fertilizer to grow plants, in the long term, since phosphate is a finite resource; so synthetic fertilizer is finite too.)

Do you still believe Ancel Keys?
Btw you need cholesterol for your brain; and dietary cholesterol does not affect your cholesterol level. Cholesterol fear mongery has all been debunked. Read Teicholtz Lustig, etc.
This is the reason factory cloning is undesirable; they’ll tamper with the food supply, “to remove harmful compounds” thereby ending up killing/hurting people, because they grasp any pseudo-scientific justification to justify legally imposing their will on others.

Also, veganism ain’t durable, because the soil will deplete, and the phosphate mines will run out as well so no more artificial fertilizer until you put dung on the fields. Vegans hate it when you say that, coz they claim the monopoly on terrifying catastrophic warnings.

George Orwell They’re all howler monkeys; typically leftist (“anti-racist”, “anti-pollution”, “climate-“) activists that are geneticaly preprogrammed to make hellish noise, just like the Latin American Simia Belzebub. So I can’t even get angry with them; it’s the genes they’re made up of, expressing themselves, they can’t help it. So the best thing all around is to deny them a platform. (politics)
Have you ever heard Vibnie Tortorich, America’s angriest trainer? he doesn’t really like vegans (for the same reasons). He’s going to make the fatdocumentary.com to try and fix dome of Keys’ damage.
If people woyud be eating enough fat instead of carbs/grains, there’d be less obesity, less diabetes.
Try and keep upyour righteous indignified superiority now; it hurts the planet’s chance to support live, it hurts thechances of the living to stay alive and not die a horrible death from diabetes, after an unpleasant (unfulfilling) live as a diabetic…
They’re the same kinds of people that protest CO2-emissions; also baseless (CO2 as high as it is now, enables the planet to feed 7 bln people; plus the only way to achieve the UN’s millennium goal of providing enough water to the people, is to facillitate photosynthesis, by emitting enough CO2. Because: plants keep open pores in their leaves until they’ve breathed in enough CO2. Water evaporates out through those pores, causing the poor farmer to have to make the choice between his family dying of hunger or of thirst.

Brood en spelen

Ik wou dat mensen eens ophielden zich gek te laten maken over moslims, want dat is alleen maar afleiding terwijl de elite het land de afgrond in dauwt.
De elite, dat zijn niet alleen de socialisten, maar ook Wilders (is ook hartstikke links, maar mss geen socialist)
Ik weet niet wat Wilders zijn economische ideologie is, zal vast veel centrale planning behelzen (dat is nu eenmaal de norm in het democratische volkskoninkrijk Nederland), maar Wilders volgt de NAVO op de voet: die wilde na de val van de muur blijven bestaan, en heeft dus dolenthousiast 11 september aangegrepen als smoesje om heel Arabië aan te vallen en daarna ook Perzië om het belastingslachtoffer te doen denken dat de NAVO nog wel nodig is. Zie Wesley Clarke: 7 wars in 5 years. Want het is onmogelijk om van politieke instellingen af te komen, zogauw die opgericht zijn. En wat is de NAVO anders dan een politieke instelling?

  • Betaald van belastinggeld
  • Geen enkele burger heeft er invloed op
  • Hyperagressief
  • Niet in staat/bereid om voor de burger op te komen

Driving cycle one crazy

There was a whole fuss about fuel consumption figures in brochures not being feasible on the road.
This should be of no concern, because if you use the consumption figures to compare cars, you could still buy Tlthe most frugal of the two. This meant that the consumer would still be best of. But: that was of no concern to the state (that after all does not care about the citizen), because the state wanted to base the degrees of punishment of individual citizens, on the fuel consumption (CO2-emmission)of the vehicle they foolishly chose to drive. Ideally they wanted to chose the vehicle the citizen was going to drive also. Even more ideally, they’d like to force the citizen out of any car at all, but that’s another subject entirely.
And to get away with the excessive punishment regime they were hoping for, they developed the New European Driving Cycle. That could generate more accurate & representative fuel consumption figures and allow more differentiated punishment, under the guise of stimulating more desirable behavior.

Over Trump en het akkoord van Parijs

Als het klimaatakkoord van Parijs iets heeft aangetoond, dan is het wel, dat overheden niet in staat of bereid zijn, om iets aan de uitstoot te doen. Zo weigert Den Haag al een halve eeuw lang om de files op te lossen. Kyoto stamt al uit 1992, het akkoord in Parijs uit 2016: 24 jaar verschil! Een kwart eeuw! En nog blijven ze het uitmelken, wat aantoont dat de politiek geen enkel gevoel van urgentie ervaart om het op te lossen. Laten we dan naar aannemen dat het ook geen echt probleem is, maar alleen maar het grootste bedrog sinds… 1917. Als de uitstoot nu nog te hoog is, dan komt dat doordat de politiek dus niet te vertrouwen is met serieuze zaken. Of de uitstoot is al afdoende verlaagd, in welk geval Trump groot gelijk heeft om uit het akkoord te stappen. Lees meer over klimaatbescherming: https://bit.ly/2qZrU3C
Maar alle landen die Kyoto hebben ondertekend, waren totalitair, en hadden dus alle kans om hun uitstoot te verlagen en hebben dat dus opzettelijk niet gedaan.