Why I’m scared

Yoy may have heard of climate change being all the rage nowadays. #Politicians and (unaffilliated) #warmists are on the barricades to make the people scared of #CO2, the lifeblood of all vegetation and hence the basis of the food chain. Leaving that aside, Dutch politicians have spent decades (over half a century, as a matter of fact) doing absolutely nothing about the traffic jams, which have cost the economy very dearly. Their refusal to do anything about the #trafficJams was comolained about, but tolerated because, oh well, if your lords and masters refuse to do their job, then what do you do about it? Just suck it up and try to cope, what else? Not vote for them? When has that ever worked? It’s a bit late when they’re already in power
But then they came up with climate change, and still refused to deal with the traffic jams, which cause incredible amounts of exhaust emmissions, including CO2 (as they complain about at any opportunity they get). I draw the conclusion that they deliberately cause such high CO2-emmissions, in an attempt to bring about #ClimateChange. That is attempted #democide at the whole planet. And such a government rather scares meas you understand.

Looming #demographic crisis in #Europe

#European #populations are aging fast, meaning the large wellfare states are becoming unaffordable. Fools blame the European people for that, as if the people have any influence on how the country runs us!
I simply refuse to comdemn any children to this certain future of:

  1. Poverty
  2. Despair
  3. Opression
  4. Victimization by politicians

So don’t bring up the fashionable complaint of muslims immigrating into society being the only way to be able to continue to afford the costly (politically-propelled) welfare-state, which is another political monstrosity forced down our throats, which we cannot get rid of, without abolishing the whiole ridiculous concept of the state.

The problem is, that the “civillized” states of western Europe are democracies (as hinted at in https://ludwigvanel.wordpress.com/2017/06/23/representative-repressive/ democratic derives from the Greek words demos – meaning as much as “people” – and cratos – “power”, so #democracy in the modern interpretation means power OVER the people. Never ever TO the people, oh no: that’s why every time there’s a #referendum here in the Netherlands, it’s never binding, only advisory; in case (in each and every one) the people want something else from what the government wants.
The only kind of proper democracy is #statelesness.

Representative == repressive?

The words look similar, as do the concepts. If you pretend/attempt to represent tonnes of people with one single person, you cannot please everyone, in fact, you’ll displease most (I know, at first glance the law of averages has it that you please half, but people are displeased in different amounts about different things, so less than half), MP’s know that, so thry stop trying to figure out what the people want, and by extent, stop caring about what we want. They only do as they themselves want, because they’re in charge.
Which is why all self-labeled #democracies are #oligarchies: minority rule; a #parliament of 150 Dutch MPs tells a population of a bit more than 17,000,000 what to do, without really representing anyone,other than themselves. The scary thing is, observing hearings they demonstrate to actually believe that they serve the people. Impossible! There are 113,333 1/3 people per MP. Each of those people has different wishes from the next, some genuinely wish to harm,their fellow country men, those are the ones that vote communist/socialist.

And I’m not even talking about the American election fraud that won, Obama the ’08 election. And that country made duch a big fuss about imposing democracy on,Arabia, at the cost of millions of lives (and rising for the foreseeable future  – and bryond?) (link to a Dutch report)

Use

Sometimes, #luxurious #provisions become too #expensive. What a business is to do then, is: excise those provisions, so e.g. no more bubble baths for the office cleaning crew, just to invent a ridiculous example.
Even though the office cleaning crew had gotten to like those bubble baths, they’ve become #unaffordable and thus #untenable.
Or #socialBenefits, which the population of a nation had come to expect, like #unemploymentBenefits, it’s very mean and all, if people can’t get those anymore, but when one pretends to have the skill set required to run a #country (a ridiculous notion: a country is only a region where people are born and die; it’s were they live, eat, sleep, i.e. exist; it’s not a business that has to be run for profit – whose profit? The population’s?), one can’t seriously refuse to make cuts in those provisions, because if one does, the country will go bankrupt.
And when you do, you can’t continue stealing from the people as much as you did. As a matter of fact, the reason that these provisions have become so unaffordable, is that they are government-commanded, and each and all have to pay into it. So really denying people the money they were promised to get out of it, is no more than ordinary intra-temporal theft.
If the government had never have been so arrogant and presumptuous to get in the people’s way, then this nonsense would not have caused the endemic problems it has. If the people would have been allowed to arrange their own affairs, they would have. But through coercion, government had crowded out such arrangements: after all, when civillians already (forcibly) pay into those arrangements, they won’t pay extra for a similar private initiative.
And the responsible persons (socialists) should have been fired from the job a long time ago, and in a business run for profit (not a country run for loss) that would have happened a long time ago.
So what use (title of this blog post) are politicians that refuse to accept reality, and instead to live in their own, private dream world? That refuse to make the required changes? Why should the population of a country continue to accept their existence, when that is so clearly against our own interests?

P.s. voor de Nederlandse lezers onder u, ik dacht bij deze dus aan de #AOW, welke met kunst- en vliegwerk gaande moet worden gehouden, totdat ook die ingrepen niet genoeg blijken; dan wordt er nog meer onrecht aangericht, en mogen/kunnen jongeren, die het moeten opbrengen voor de ouderen (dankzij het belachelijke omslag-principe, ipv een #spaarpensioen) niet 1 cent ontvangen in hun eigen oude dag, want tegen die tijd is al het geld alweer op. Ad infinitum. Daarom: bespaar het volk de ellende, en adviseer jongeren,om hun eigen zaakjes te regelen. Schaf daarom de AOW af en laat Wouter Bos, Wim Kok en nog meer PvdA’ers en andere socialisten de eigen portemonnee trekken, om de ouderen die niet hebben espaard voor hun oude dag (omdat het allemaal zo mooi was geregeld door de overheid!) maar uit eigen zak betalen. Zij zijn tenslotte degenen die ervoor verantwoordelijk zijn, dat miljoenen mensen in de #financiële #problemen gaan komen. Laat ze het dan zelf maar voelen: dat heet #regeringsverantwoordelijkheid nemen.

An arising strand of philosophy

I’m disconcerted by/about the arising of a strand of philosophy that claims that lacking a (fictional) social contract, coercion of the population is acceptable.
Such activists clearly that neither the French in 1792, nor the Russians in the early 1990s, had a right to overthrow their oppresive, exploitative governments.
Such people clearly lack both perspective and a functioning moral compass. The solution/refutation is so simple: all governments are capable of, is:

  • Lying
  • Deceiving
  • Destroying
  • Killing
  • And to finance all that: Stealing.

(Fits nicely on the digits of one hand!)

The people are the only ones actually capable of producing.
So: are people better off with or without a government?
And what would be the implied order of priority Seems to me that people outrank government. So the only acceptable coercion is of politicians., by civillians. Since that’s never gonna happen, because politicians have to volunteer for the job and they only volunteer for jobs when they can have some fun in them, thesloution is staring us in the face, government is entirely unworkable/unacceptable/ even downright impossible.
So: time for an overthrowing (of academia & of government).

American political treason

It’s not just Dutch / EU politicians that attack the population/the planet, oh no… Don’t rule out #Obama/#GWB (#George W. #Bush), who both pretended to believe in #Gorism. And who both were responsible for #Echelon, a ridiculous espionage program that consumes so much energy that the Tenth Amendment center attempts to shut down Echelon by keeping states from supplying cooling water to the Echelon computers (GWB started it: Obama continued it; I don’t expect #Trump’s to stop it)

Let that sink in for a bit: the Echelon systems need water-cooling, they use so much energy that even regular air cooling doesn’t suffice. Energy-generation emits heaps of CO2.

All that in order to listen in on Angela Merckel’s cellphone conversations! Angela #Merckel is chief humanoid of the German government! Germany is a #NATO-ally!

Again, #treason, #4thReich