Het onvermogen om met geweld een doel te bereiken

Jawel, haal Godwin maar van stal.
Want, itt de Nederlandse politiek, had Hitler wel geprobeerd iets te doen aan het woningtekort (in Duitsland). Maar Hitler, als übersocialist, kwam niet verder dan de woonruimte te herverdelen, dus andermans woonruimte af te pakken en te geven aan mensen die het zgn wel verdienden.
Natuurlijk is dat onzin. En kenmerkend voor de onkunde van de politiek, die alleen in staat is grof geweld te gebruiken om problemen op te lossen.
Ander voorbeeld: de #Hitler (1 van de) van deze eeuw, George W. #Bush, die met genoegen zich liet vertellen dat Saddam #Hoessein achter 9/11 zat. Diens oplossing om 9/11 te voorkomen (…) was om hard om.zich heen te slaan en precies datgene te doen wat 9/11 heeft veroorzaakt: omvang en misdaden #4eRijk uitbreiden.

Advertisements

“Mayor Sadiq Khan is to blame for terror attacks”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5949025/London-Mayor-Sadiq-Khan-blame-terror-attacks-city-Trump-argues.html
Actually, in defense of Mr. Khan, the attacks in Europe would not have happened if the junta from DC, whose policy is now continued by president Trump (time to get the promised draining going, Donald!) would not have terrorised the peoples of Arabia (Persia is next on the menu?), Asia, South America.
Of course, the European dictators are equally to blame, for their keenness to participate in the #FourthReich’s #Terrorism

For some reason, it fails to dawn on politicians that people don’t respond well to bullying, regardless of where they live.

Snelweg

WO3 komt steeds dichterbij. De NAVO is uitgekeken geraakt op (bombardementen op) moslims, dus gaan ze zich nu alvast voorbereiden op snel troepenvervoer richting Rusland.
O, was het Nederlandse leger maar zo ingericht als het Zwitserse: dat is een onneembaar fort, waar zelfs Hitler zijn vingers niet aan durfde te branden. Omdat het leger bestaat uit de bevolking kan het niet op strafexpeditie worden gestuurd, en zal het dus nooit een tegeninvasie uitlokken. Contraterreuraanslagen als 9/11, Brussel, Londen, München, Parijs zullen het volk daar ook wel bespaard blijven.

Indochinese evidence

For any evidence that the evil that governments pour millions of dollars, lives and tonnes of #CO2 into fighting its owbn messes, one can look at #ISIS, but another example would be the spread of communism. Because both in Africa as well as Asia (in this example: Indochina/Vietnam) the western occupying colonists called themselves capitalists, so when the locals wanted to fight for freedom, they turned to the USSR.
The same is happening in Arabia: #NATO is bombing desperate people into the embrace of IS on a daily basis.

Interpretation of data on Carbon Dioxide

On this blog, I’ve written a Dutch post ( https://ludwigvanel.wordpress.com/2018/06/04/180604-interpretatie-van-grafieken-ipcc-data/ ) about my interpretation of these data: http://www.ipcc-data.org/observ/ddc_co2.html (English), the graphics seem to indicate that before, during and after the Kyoto treaty, CO2 kept rising increasingly sharp. Keep in mind that (apart from perhaps Liechtenstein and Bhutan), all governments aee totalitatlrian, meaning that they busybody the total collection of aspects of the life of all citizens. So, at the very least the people could have expected a reduction in the speed of CO2 increase. Didn’t happen.
Meaning either one of these:

  1. Humanity has no discernible impact on the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, so none of the economic terror committed by politicians can be justified.
  2. Politicians have made every effort to maximize CO2-levels, ie by means of increasing traffic jams (example: Dutch politicians for the last over half a century), or by sending expeditionary armies all over the globe (example:#4thReich). Modern wars are fought using tanks, planes, ships, etc that emit enormous amounts of CO2 (not counting Echelon, the computers of which need water cooling, that’s how much energy they burn, just to listen in on Merckel’s phone calls – Merckel was an ally of Obama! And Obama was one of Gore’s high preachers, and responsible for 7 wars in 8 years. Both had a Nobel prize for peace). Politicians are committing climate terrorism.

Either way, the economic terror is unjustifiable (as an aside, neither is the military).

Actually, GWB may have done the right thing

By the founding of ISIS (which he only facilitated, he did not found them himself) the problems in the Middle-East were caused by the western countries (originally France and GB) designing countries, by merely drawing lines on the map, splitting up tribes, forcing together tribes that disliked eachother. Thanks to GWB, Iraq (one of the artificial post-WW1-creations) was replaced by the homogenous blob called Islamic State, which should not be fought by the Fourth Reich, but should be allowed to fall apart into tiny countries, along less frictional fractional lines, where the Sunni minority leadership will not have to engage in beastly oppression of the Shia majority, in order to maintain its precarious hold of power.

Geluid van de vrijheid?

Ik kan me niet vinden in het voorstel dat het gebulder van de straalmotor van een JSF het geluid van de vrijheid is. Die militaire onzin wordt altijd alleen maar ingezet om de vrijheid te beknotten. Zeker het Amerikaanse leger (hun president beslist ook waar het zgn. “Nederlandse” leger wordt ingezet, en Rutte juicht dat toe), dient alleen maar om op verre continenten terreur te bedrijven en contraterreur à la (in alfabetische volgorde), 9/11, #Brussel, #Londen, #München, #Parijs op te wekken. Om die Islamitische terreur te “bestrijden” wordt de vrijheid van alle burgers beknot.