Is this really how the left sees itself?

Is this really how the left sees itself? As the well-meaning (and morally and intellectually superior) victim? When it is the fucking left that started hysterically assaulting anyone within reach.

Obama+Biden: 8 years, 7 wars, 2 terms, 1 Nobel for peace and 0 days of peace, 0 complaints, even comments by Al Gore.

Then came Trump: 6 peace treaties in 4 years, complaints up the wazoo by assorted pundits incl Gore. Trump was the best climate prez ever, yet Gore compained about him. Confirming that CC was not real, only a hockey-stick shaped baton to beat on the people with.

By voting for Biden, 80 mln Dems committed acts of terrorism (record turnout!)

Dems were so keen to take revenge on Trump-voters, that they were willing to destroy all life on earth to kill them.

How might mankind cope with such hatred? Open season on registered Dems? Or giving them a chance to admit they never believed in CC. (Just like Al Gore) they only saw it as an oppiOorrunity to prove their superiority over non-Dems and to justify the punishments they doled out.

Why would citizens make sacrifices to lower carbon-emissions, when the govt will simply compensate that lowering by launching unprovoked expeditionary war after unprovoked expeditionary war? In an attempt to keep CO2-level dangerously high.

The numbers cause some concern

https://ludwigvanel.wordpress.com/2023/07/18/how/

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/25/937248659/president-elect-biden-hits-80-million-votes-in-year-of-record-turnout

80.000.000 voted for Joe Biden in the full knowledge of his climate crimes.


It is not far fetched to think that Dems believe in Gore’s climate-message. So: they wish to destroy all life on earth, not just Americans (or only themselves, or even only them despiccable Trump-voters), but ALL LIFE, including themselves and animals. And plants, trees, fish. This causes concern beyond belief (sorry for being overly meek)

Socialists are liars

“Socialism is an economic philosophy: it means social control of the means of production” No: it’s not and doesn’t.

Socialism means: power from society to the state. Meaning: zero social influence over the MoP.

As Hayek wrote:

When the state controls your economic life, it controls your entire life.

Because: economics is needed to acquire the resources to live (food, drink, shelter, a modicum of pleasure). Socialists won’t stop at control over your economic life (economic slavery), but over every aspect of your life (sexual slavery, since they derive sexual pleasure from abusing you).

To ex, or to ex? Attempt to answer the question

This line is getting tedious: There have been >1/2 a century of traffic jams on Dutch roads, incl 1/4 century of the Kyoto-protocol, 1/8 century of Prime minister Mark Rutte and 5 years of current climate minister Rob Jetten in parliament.

And the ongoing expeditionary warfare, in the Middle-east and Afghanistan was followed by a western-provoked invasion in the Ukrayne. the question is: are they trying to exterminate us (and all life on earth, including themselves and Ukraynians?), or are they trying to exploit us? or to exterminate us?

Really, both are possible.

Let’s try to divine which is the one:

Kill pro: (they sincerely believe #CO2 is harmful)

Ongoing refusal to deal with Dutch traffic jams (this can also be a pro for exploitation)

Ongoin unprovoked expeditionary warfare. Causing vast amounts of CO2 (and costing heaps of money, which taxpayers have to produce by emitting lots of CO2)

Kill con (This is exploit pro)

They don’t believe CO2 is harmful.

At least 3/4 of a century of housing shortage in the Netherlands

But if they would want to destroy life on earth, they would try to kill themselves, with us. Otoh, why would that discount this position? Anyone crazy enough to want to destroy all life on the only planet known to house it (there are several of planets lightyears away that might be able to house life, but – earth-like – life has only ever been confirmed on earth.)

Combined with: ongoing absorption of refugees, even though The Netherlands is probably the most densely populated country in the world. Accepted asylum seekers can’t leave the shelter, because they can not find a house. So: shortage of shelter-space.

Imposition of the Euro, on countries with widely diverging cultures/economies. Any look at the exchange rates of the currencies had shown it could not work. Maths (Benford’s law) had strongly suggested that the Greek govt had faked it’s economic data. This was ignored, for the purpose of getting Greece into the Euro anyway and to make it a drain in the taxpayers of northern countries. And sent its own economy to shreds.

Important preface:

The US armed forces emit as much CO2 as 140 countries.

https://theconversation.com/us-military-is-a-bigger-polluter-than-as-many-as-140-countries-shrinking-this-war-machine-is-a-must-119269

During their 8 years, president Obama and VP Biden have regularly stated that climate change is real, and needed to be fought by taxing the fertilizer out of the people. Yet they did not change their behaviour. In their 8 years, they had 7 wars, 1 Nobel for peace and 0 days of peace. And Al Gore did not even clear his throat at that.

Donald Trump: in his 4 years he had 6 peace treaties, and a few military interventions, at a smaller scale than those of Clinton/Gore(!) or Obama/Biden). Making him the best climate president in the entire history of the USA. And yet Al Gore criticized Donald Trump, for withdrawing from the fake Paris-accord. Thereby suggesting very strongly, that it was all political posturing. About getting his political way and enslaving all humanity in perpetuity.

The fake Paris-accord was no more than propaganda: pathetic, hollow posturing. Counttries just wrote on a piece of paper what they might do, iirc Bangladesh promised to start reducing CO2 after it had reached peak emissions! All those hollow gestures were stapled together, hailed as the grestest thing to happen to mankind since the Atom bomb.

In my humble opinion, the preponderance of evidence points to exploitation, not extermination.

Omtzigt, bespioneren & censuur

https://youtu.be/PkaHPazGGG0 Op Youtube: Omtzigt is fel m.b.t bespioneren & censuur. “Dit doe je in een dictatuur, niet in een democratie.”

Pieter, bespaar je adem. De enige reden dat de kamers nog bijeenkomen, is om de schijn van een levensvatbare democratie te wekken. Niemand gelooft dat nog! Partijen worden gestraft als ze zich aan hun verkiezingsbelofte houden of het de coalitie moeilijk maken. Dus koning, kamer en kabinet hebben in ’17 de democratie beëindigd. Het enige democratische wat er onder Rutte is gebeurt, is D66’s niet-bindende referendum afschaffen, wat de staat het recht gaf, de expliciet uitgesproken wens van de kiezer te negeren.

Ongeschikt

De Nederlandse regering is ongeschikt, om dit (eender welk) land te besturen. In elk geval in de huidige tijd, met een dreigende wereldoorlog. De regering heeft hard gewerkt zich impopulair te maken en stuurt nu aan op escalatie van een oorlog waar we niets mee te maken hebben. Definitief bewijs van onkunde.

De Nederlandse burger veracht dit regime, met on-Nederlandse passie, omdat dat zo hard heeft gewerkt de burger tegen zich in het harnas te jagen, door alleen aan zichzelf te denken. En verkiezingsuitslagen te verwerpen, omdat die hen niet beviel. Dat begon geloof ik door die instabiele rotmunt op te dringen, ondanks veel protest. De Europese grondwet moest nb een andere naam krijgen, door die vervelende burger. Niemand die de regering nu gaat steunen, als Rutte zijn oorlog krijgt.

Iets over boontjes, toch?

Slager

Commissie: geen harde bewijzen voor georganiseerd ritueel kindermisbruik. https://nos.nl/artikel/2457253-commissie-geen-harde-bewijzen-voor-georganiseerd-ritueel-kindermisbruik

De slager keurt zijn eigen vlees. Toen Omtzigt na zijn titanenarbeid met de toeslagen, Demmink’s vermeende pedofilie wilde onderzoeken, stak Rutte daar een stokje voor. Was blijkbaar overtuigd van Demmink’s schuld.

Now they are forcing us to rise up

https://t.me/rtnews

EU blocks sales of fertilizer to Russia, risks starving 274 million to death.

Remember Stalin’s holodomor? This is doing exactly the same to the Russian people as Stalin did to Russians and Ukraynians.

Spark of hope: they are is punishing the Russians for not risking imprisonment or worse, in an attempt to throw of Putin. Putin could see this as an act of war He could retaliate with his hypersonic missiles, which would escalate to WW3.

Since politicians are deliberately risking our lives, they are forcing us to risk imprisonment or worse to remove them. Their own decree. So they can not logically imprison us for obeying them. If they do, oh dear: you better not obey government ever, in whichever case. Fight politics at every turn, your leaders order you to!